Is Trump really fighting the elite or implementing their plan with a new narrative?

Anti-globalist rhetoric, but aligned actions: Is Trump really fighting the elite or implementing their plan with a new narrative?

Today, we address a topic of extreme relevance and urgency concerning health and public health issues. I want to clarify that I am not a doctor, but we will analyze some ongoing debates in the field of medicine, not only in the United States but worldwide.

A central point of discussion involves President Donald Trump and some of his recent statements and actions that have sparked strong reactions among his own supporters. In particular, he was heavily booed at an event, leading us to ask: why did this happen? What did he do to deserve such a reaction?

According to available sources, the main reason appears to be Trump’s praise of Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla during a public event. The president called him "a great person, a great entrepreneur," triggering outrage from his own audience, which does not look favorably on Bourla’s figure and, more broadly, Pfizer's role during the health crisis. This episode has raised numerous questions: why did Trump decide to praise a figure so contested by his own supporters? Did he do it intentionally, knowing he would be booed, with the aim of humiliating Bourla? Or, on the contrary, does he truly believe in Pfizer's work?

Some of his most ardent supporters claim that the president did it on purpose, knowing the audience would react that way. However, this theory presents contradictions, especially considering that it was Trump himself, through the Operation Warp Speed project, who provided large sums of money to pharmaceutical companies to accelerate the development of vaccines during the health crisis. This aspect is crucial: if his supporters strongly oppose vaccines and the pharmaceutical companies that developed them, how can they ignore the fact that it was Trump himself who promoted and funded these programs?

Additionally, it has emerged that Trump had a long conversation with Bill Gates at the beginning of 2025, during which they discussed public health issues. This detail is significant because it shows a cooperative relationship between Trump and Gates on these matters, despite the fact that many of Trump’s supporters consider Gates a problematic figure.

Another critical point concerns the "Stargate Project," recently announced by Trump, which involves an investment of $500 billion for the development of artificial intelligence and its application to biotechnology, utilizing RNA-based technologies to develop new cures for incurable diseases. This project raises further concerns among his supporters, who see an apparent conflict between Trump's promises and his concrete actions.

Meanwhile, troubling news is emerging regarding the possible introduction of vaccines into food products. The U.S. government has recently approved the use of vaccines to protect livestock, particularly chickens, from the H5N1 avian flu. This opens the door to a broader debate on food safety and the possible use of genetic technologies to immunize the population through food.

An even more disturbing issue has arisen from a study conducted by Yale University, which identified the presence of specific immunological markers in some individuals after vaccination. This study suggests that some people may have developed chronic post-vaccination health problems, including persistent fatigue, brain fog, and weakened immune systems. These symptoms resemble some manifestations associated with diseases such as HIV/AIDS, fueling further speculation about the potential long-term consequences of mass vaccination campaigns.

The question many are now asking is: how long will it take to see the full effects of these decisions? If we compare the current situation to diseases like HIV, which can take years to manifest, we must ask whether in five or ten years, new health issues might emerge related to the medical choices made during the pandemic crisis.

In conclusion, we are facing a complex scenario where politics, healthcare, biotechnology, and economic interests intertwine. It is essential to maintain a critical mindset and stay well-informed to understand the true impact of the decisions being made today, which could profoundly influence our future.

Is Donald Trump Actually Advancing the Agenda 2030?

Based on Trump’s actions, it appears that despite his public statements opposing Agenda 2030 and globalist elites, he is in fact implementing many of their policies—albeit under a different narrative.

Here are some key elements that suggest this possibility:

• Operation Warp Speed – During his presidency, Trump allocated billions of dollars to pharmaceutical companies to rapidly develop vaccines. This initiative accelerated the introduction of mRNA technology, aligning with Agenda 2030’s goals on public health and biotech innovation.

• Stargate Project – Announced in 2025, this plan involves a massive investment in artificial intelligence and biotechnology, with a focus on RNA-based therapies. This aligns perfectly with the transhumanist agenda and Big Pharma’s ambitions to integrate AI into global healthcare.

• Ties with Bill Gates and Big Pharma – Despite his populist rhetoric, Trump has continued to collaborate with figures like Bill Gates, a known proponent of Agenda 2030, and has even praised Pfizer’s CEO, whose company played a central role in the management of the health crisis.

• Digitalization and Health Control – Trump’s policies seem to promote the integration of digital tools and AI-driven healthcare systems, which closely align with Agenda 2030’s objectives for global health governance.

• Support for Big Tech and Global Finance – Despite his anti-establishment rhetoric, Trump maintains strong ties with Wall Street and Silicon Valley elites, including Elon Musk and other tech and finance leaders. Many of these figures are directly involved in Agenda 2030 initiatives, such as the World Economic Forum.

While Trump presents himself as an opponent of globalist elites, his actions indicate that he may be rebranding and implementing their agenda under a new narrative.

Conclusion:

Although Trump presents himself as an opponent of globalist elites, the facts indicate that many of his policies are actually facilitating the same technological and healthcare transformation promoted by Agenda 2030. The key difference lies in the narrative: while progressives and globalists push these transformations in the name of sustainability and equality, Trump and his allies are implementing them under the rhetoric of "government efficiency" and "American innovation."

Whether the end goal is the same or if there are parallel strategies with different objectives remains a topic of debate, but what is certain is that Trump is not stopping these transformations as many of his supporters believe.

Evidence Linking Trump to This Agenda:

• Approval of Vaccines for Livestock

  • During his administration, the use of vaccines for poultry against avian influenza was approved.
  • This opens the door to the possibility that RNA biotechnologies could be integrated into everyday food products.

• Collaboration with Big Pharma

  • Trump praised Pfizer’s CEO despite strong opposition from his supporters.
  • He also funded Operation Warp Speed, which provided billions of dollars to pharmaceutical companies to accelerate vaccine development.
  • This suggests a strong connection between Trump and industries promoting biotechnology in health and food production.

• Stargate Project: AI, Biotechnology, and Healthcare Integration

  • Trump announced the Stargate Project, a $500 billion investment to integrate artificial intelligence and biotechnology in healthcare.
  • The stated goal is to develop advanced treatments for incurable diseases, but the risk is that these technologies could be incorporated into food and medical systems without transparency.

• Conversations with Bill Gates

  • Trump had a 3-hour meeting with Bill Gates to discuss public health strategies.
  • Gates is a well-known proponent of vaccination through food and biotechnology in agriculture, raising questions about Trump's real intentions.

• Parallels with Agenda 2030

  • Agenda 2030 promotes the replacement of natural food with synthetic, corporately controlled alternatives.
  • While Trump publicly opposes Agenda 2030, he is funding and supporting the same biotechnological advancements in food, digital health, and controlled food production.

Ultimately, Trump may not be openly advocating for Agenda 2030, but his policies are undeniably pushing forward its core objectives under a different branding.

Is Trump Pushing for Biotechnological Food?

Yes, even though he is not openly declaring it.

While presenting himself as an opponent of globalist elites, Trump is supporting initiatives that align with the goals of Agenda 2030. Biotechnological food could become a tool for implementing health policies without the explicit consent of the population. Trump is not blocking this agenda but rather rebranding it under a new narrative to make it more acceptable to his supporters.

Trump is not officially promoting these technologies, but he is funding and enabling their expansion. While globalists seek to impose Agenda 2030 under the guise of sustainability, Trump appears to be introducing the same innovations, but under the rhetoric of "technological innovation for America." The risk is that, by supporting Big Pharma, Big Tech, and Big Food, Trump could act as a Trojan horse for the introduction of biotech food control.

Among the technologies involved are RNA vaccines integrated into food, allowing the administration of health treatments through genetically modified food, lab-grown meat, promoted as a sustainable alternative to traditional meat but potentially containing biotechnological additives, and the use of nanoparticles in food for the controlled release of substances into the human body. Additionally, biosensors and food monitoring systems are being developed, capable of collecting health data from consumers, along with the concept of food social credit, which aims to track and limit the consumption of specific foods based on environmental and health criteria.

Whether this is a deliberate strategy or simply a result of his political and financial choices remains an open question.

#Trump #Agenda2030 #BiotechFood #RNAtechnology #BigPharma #BigTech #BigFood #ArtificialIntelligence #LabGrownMeat #FoodControl #HealthPolicies #DigitalHealth #FoodSurveillance #Biotechnology #Transhumanism #GlobalAgenda #PublicHealth #Vaccines #FoodSecurity #GeneticModification #TrumpPolicies